Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to San Ramon
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to San Ramon, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | San Ramon (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 75,048 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $104,587 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $863,800 |
| White | 81% | 44% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 44% |
| With Kids | 23% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 54% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or San Ramon?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than San Ramon: 21680 compared with 75048 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in San Ramon?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or San Ramon?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 29% for San Ramon.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z