Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to San Francisco
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $927,400 |
| White | 81% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 3% | 34% |
| With Kids | 23% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 54% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or San Francisco?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 21680 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z