Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to San Bruno
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $754,700 |
| White | 81% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 28% |
| With Kids | 23% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or San Bruno?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 21680 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z