Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Pico Rivera
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $380,200 |
| White | 81% | 55% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 3% |
| With Kids | 23% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 36 |
| Rentals | 54% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Pico Rivera?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 21680 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z