Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to North Highlands
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to North Highlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | North Highlands (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 47,357 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $35,489 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $168,300 |
| White | 81% | 65% |
| Black | 1% | 13% |
| Asian | 3% | 6% |
| With Kids | 23% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 31 |
| Rentals | 54% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or North Highlands?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than North Highlands: 21680 compared with 47357 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in North Highlands?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or North Highlands?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 57% for North Highlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z