Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Long Beach
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $476,400 |
| White | 81% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 12% |
| Asian | 3% | 13% |
| With Kids | 23% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 54% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Long Beach?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 21680 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z