Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Lake Forest
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $585,100 |
| White | 81% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 15% |
| With Kids | 23% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Lake Forest?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 21680 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z