Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Jurupa Valley
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Jurupa Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Jurupa Valley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 102,202 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $38,551 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $308,900 |
| White | 81% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 2% |
| With Kids | 23% | 47% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 31 |
| Rentals | 54% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Jurupa Valley?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than Jurupa Valley: 21680 compared with 102202 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Jurupa Valley?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Jurupa Valley?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 34% for Jurupa Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z