Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Foster City
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 81% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 47% |
| With Kids | 23% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Foster City?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a smaller population count than Foster City: 21680 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z