Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to East Los Angeles
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to East Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | East Los Angeles (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 123,905 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $29,480 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $349,200 |
| White | 81% | 48% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 1% |
| With Kids | 23% | 47% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 31 |
| Rentals | 54% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or East Los Angeles?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than East Los Angeles: 21680 compared with 123905 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in East Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or East Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: East Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 67% for East Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z