Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Burbank
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $574,300 |
| White | 81% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 11% |
| With Kids | 23% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Burbank?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 21680 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z