Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Beverly Hills
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 81% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 9% |
| With Kids | 23% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 54% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Beverly Hills?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 21680 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z