Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Gate to South Pasadena
This post compares South Gate, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Gate (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 95,420 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $31,396 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $351,000 | $928,500 |
| White | 60% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 0% | 29% |
| With Kids | 52% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 40 |
| Rentals | 56% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Gate or South Pasadena?
A: South Gate has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 95420 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Gate or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Gate.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Gate or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Gate.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Gate does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 56% for South Gate versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Gate may include: Watsonville, Salinas, and San-Fernando.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z