Compare-Cities.com
Compare South El Monte to Pico Rivera
This post compares South El Monte, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South El Monte (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,712 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $28,039 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,400 | $380,200 |
| White | 59% | 55% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 3% |
| With Kids | 40% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 36 |
| Rentals | 52% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South El Monte or Pico Rivera?
A: South El Monte has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 20712 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South El Monte or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South El Monte.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South El Monte or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South El Monte.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for South El Monte versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South El Monte may include: Montebello, Yuba-City, and Lodi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z