Compare-Cities.com
Compare South El Monte to Chino Hills
This post compares South El Monte, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South El Monte (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,712 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $28,039 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,400 | $567,200 |
| White | 59% | 46% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 14% | 33% |
| With Kids | 40% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 52% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South El Monte or Chino Hills?
A: South El Monte has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 20712 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South El Monte or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South El Monte.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South El Monte or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South El Monte.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for South El Monte versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South El Monte may include: Montebello, Yuba-City, and Lodi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z