Compare-Cities.com
Compare South El Monte to Chico
This post compares South El Monte, California to Chico, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South El Monte (city) | Chico (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,712 | 90,660 |
| Income (median) | $28,039 | $43,253 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,400 | $286,700 |
| White | 59% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 40% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 29 |
| Rentals | 52% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South El Monte or Chico?
A: South El Monte has a much smaller population count than Chico: 20712 compared with 90660 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South El Monte or in Chico?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South El Monte.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South El Monte or Chico?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South El Monte.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 52% for South El Monte versus 55% for Chico.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South El Monte may include: Montebello, Yuba-City, and Lodi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z