Compare-Cities.com
Compare South El Monte to Beverly Hills
This post compares South El Monte, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South El Monte (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,712 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $28,039 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 59% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 9% |
| With Kids | 40% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 43 |
| Rentals | 52% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South El Monte or Beverly Hills?
A: South El Monte has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 20712 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South El Monte or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South El Monte.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South El Monte or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South El Monte.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 52% for South El Monte versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South El Monte may include: Montebello, Yuba-City, and Lodi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z