Compare-Cities.com
Compare South El Monte to Ashland
This post compares South El Monte, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South El Monte (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,712 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $28,039 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,400 | $396,400 |
| White | 59% | 44% |
| Black | 0% | 17% |
| Asian | 14% | 20% |
| With Kids | 40% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 52% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South El Monte or Ashland?
A: South El Monte has a similar population count than Ashland: 20712 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South El Monte or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South El Monte.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South El Monte or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South El Monte.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for South El Monte versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South El Monte may include: Montebello, Yuba-City, and Lodi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z