Compare-Cities.com
Compare Simi Valley to South Pasadena
This post compares Simi Valley, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Simi Valley (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126,546 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $61,651 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $508,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 79% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 9% | 29% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 40 |
| Rentals | 28% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Simi Valley or South Pasadena?
A: Simi Valley has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 126546 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Simi Valley or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Simi Valley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Simi Valley or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Simi Valley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Simi Valley versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Simi Valley may include: Glendora, Petaluma, and Windsor.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z