Compare-Cities.com
Compare Simi Valley to South El Monte
This post compares Simi Valley, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Simi Valley (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126,546 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $61,651 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $508,600 | $389,400 |
| White | 79% | 59% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 9% | 14% |
| With Kids | 35% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 34 |
| Rentals | 28% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Simi Valley or South El Monte?
A: Simi Valley has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 126546 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Simi Valley or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Simi Valley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Simi Valley or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Simi Valley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Simi Valley versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Simi Valley may include: Glendora, Petaluma, and Windsor.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z