Compare-Cities.com
Compare Simi Valley to San Fernando
This post compares Simi Valley, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Simi Valley (city) | San Fernando (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 126,546 | 24,581 |
Income (median) | $61,651 | $37,371 |
Home Value (median) | $508,600 | $370,300 |
White | 79% | 57% |
Black | 1% | 1% |
Asian | 9% | 1% |
With Kids | 35% | 49% |
Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
Rentals | 28% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Simi Valley or San Fernando?
A: Simi Valley has a much larger population count than San Fernando: 126546 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Simi Valley or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Simi Valley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Simi Valley or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Simi Valley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Simi Valley versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Simi Valley may include: Glendora, Petaluma, and Windsor.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z