Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Woodland
This post compares Selma, California to Woodland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Woodland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 58,324 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $45,325 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $316,500 |
| White | 78% | 69% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 54% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Woodland?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Woodland: 24537 compared with 58324 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Woodland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Woodland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Woodland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 44% for Woodland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z