Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Watsonville
This post compares Selma, California to Watsonville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Watsonville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 53,452 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $31,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $397,900 |
| White | 78% | 55% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 54% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 29 |
| Rentals | 41% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Watsonville?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Watsonville: 24537 compared with 53452 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Watsonville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Watsonville?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 58% for Watsonville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z