Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Wasco
This post compares Selma, California to Wasco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Wasco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 26,378 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $31,042 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $155,800 |
| White | 78% | 78% |
| Black | 0% | 6% |
| Asian | 4% | 0% |
| With Kids | 54% | 59% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 28 |
| Rentals | 41% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Wasco?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Wasco: 24537 compared with 26378 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Wasco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Wasco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wasco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 45% for Wasco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z