Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Visalia
This post compares Selma, California to Visalia, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Visalia (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 130,047 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $44,703 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $207,400 |
| White | 78% | 78% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 54% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 31 |
| Rentals | 41% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Visalia?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Visalia: 24537 compared with 130047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Visalia?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Visalia?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 40% for Visalia.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z