Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Victorville
This post compares Selma, California to Victorville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Victorville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 121,721 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $39,074 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $177,600 |
| White | 78% | 64% |
| Black | 0% | 16% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 54% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 29 |
| Rentals | 41% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Victorville?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Victorville: 24537 compared with 121721 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Victorville?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Victorville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Victorville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 46% for Victorville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z