Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Upland
This post compares Selma, California to Upland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Upland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 76,155 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $50,675 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $465,200 |
| White | 78% | 63% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 54% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Upland?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Upland: 24537 compared with 76155 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Upland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Upland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Upland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 44% for Upland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z