Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Selma, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $322,800 |
| White | 78% | 36% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 54% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 41% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or South San Jose Hills?
A: Selma has a similar population count than South San Jose Hills: 24537 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z