Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to South San Francisco
This post compares Selma, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 78% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 54% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or South San Francisco?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24537 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z