Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Selma, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $374,600 |
| White | 78% | 81% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 54% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Selma has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 24537 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z