Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to South El Monte
This post compares Selma, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $389,400 |
| White | 78% | 59% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 54% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 41% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or South El Monte?
A: Selma has a similar population count than South El Monte: 24537 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z