Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to San Mateo
This post compares Selma, California to San Mateo, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | San Mateo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 103,500 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $75,635 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $921,700 |
| White | 78% | 57% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 22% |
| With Kids | 54% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or San Mateo?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than San Mateo: 24537 compared with 103500 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in San Mateo?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or San Mateo?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Mateo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 45% for San Mateo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z