Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to San Francisco
This post compares Selma, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 78% | 47% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 34% |
| With Kids | 54% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or San Francisco?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 24537 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z