Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to San Bruno
This post compares Selma, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $754,700 |
| White | 78% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 54% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or San Bruno?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 24537 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z