Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Rowland Heights
This post compares Selma, California to Rowland Heights, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Rowland Heights (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 50,572 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $42,165 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $594,400 |
| White | 78% | 24% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 61% |
| With Kids | 54% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 41 |
| Rentals | 41% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Rowland Heights?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Rowland Heights: 24537 compared with 50572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Rowland Heights?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Rowland Heights?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 34% for Rowland Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z