Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Roseville
This post compares Selma, California to Roseville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Roseville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 130,705 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $64,526 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $386,300 |
| White | 78% | 78% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 54% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Roseville?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Roseville: 24537 compared with 130705 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Roseville?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Roseville?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 35% for Roseville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z