Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Riverbank
This post compares Selma, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $247,200 |
| White | 78% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 41% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Riverbank?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Riverbank: 24537 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z