Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Richmond
This post compares Selma, California to Richmond, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Richmond (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 108,853 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $42,533 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $371,900 |
| White | 78% | 39% |
| Black | 0% | 20% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 54% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Richmond?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Richmond: 24537 compared with 108853 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Richmond?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Richmond?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 49% for Richmond.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z