Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Rialto
This post compares Selma, California to Rialto, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Rialto (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 102,708 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $35,478 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $260,200 |
| White | 78% | 61% |
| Black | 0% | 12% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 54% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 30 |
| Rentals | 41% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Rialto?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Rialto: 24537 compared with 102708 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Rialto?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Rialto?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 36% for Rialto.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z