Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Reedley
This post compares Selma, California to Reedley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Reedley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 25,419 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $32,215 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $174,100 |
| White | 78% | 73% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 54% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 31 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Reedley?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Reedley: 24537 compared with 25419 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Reedley?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Reedley?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 38% for Reedley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z