Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Redondo Beach
This post compares Selma, California to Redondo Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Redondo Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 67,950 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $82,056 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $817,300 |
| White | 78% | 72% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 12% |
| With Kids | 54% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 41% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Redondo Beach?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Redondo Beach: 24537 compared with 67950 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Redondo Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Redondo Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redondo Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 49% for Redondo Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z