Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Porterville
This post compares Selma, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $163,100 |
| White | 78% | 77% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 30 |
| Rentals | 41% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Porterville?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Porterville: 24537 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z