Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Patterson
This post compares Selma, California to Patterson, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Patterson (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 21,497 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $43,090 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $258,600 |
| White | 78% | 72% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 30 |
| Rentals | 41% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Patterson?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Patterson: 24537 compared with 21497 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Patterson?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Patterson?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 38% for Patterson.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z