Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Palm Springs
This post compares Selma, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $340,600 |
| White | 78% | 83% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 54 |
| Rentals | 41% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Palm Springs?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 24537 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z