Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Los Angeles
This post compares Selma, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $549,800 |
| White | 78% | 52% |
| Black | 0% | 8% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 54% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Los Angeles?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 24537 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z