Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Long Beach
This post compares Selma, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $476,400 |
| White | 78% | 52% |
| Black | 0% | 12% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 54% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 41% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Long Beach?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 24537 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z