Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Lompoc
This post compares Selma, California to Lompoc, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Lompoc (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 43,762 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $36,752 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $269,100 |
| White | 78% | 64% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 54% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 41% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Lompoc?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Lompoc: 24537 compared with 43762 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Lompoc?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Lompoc?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lompoc does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 57% for Lompoc.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z