Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Laguna Hills
This post compares Selma, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $649,700 |
| White | 78% | 69% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 54% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 41 |
| Rentals | 41% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Laguna Hills?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Laguna Hills: 24537 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z