Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to La Verne
This post compares Selma, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $535,900 |
| White | 78% | 74% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 54% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or La Verne?
A: Selma has a similar population count than La Verne: 24537 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z