Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Imperial Beach
This post compares Selma, California to Imperial Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Imperial Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 27,270 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $39,262 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $433,400 |
| White | 78% | 71% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 54% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 31 |
| Rentals | 41% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Imperial Beach?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Imperial Beach: 24537 compared with 27270 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Imperial Beach?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Imperial Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 68% for Imperial Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z